bioaccess® vs ICON plc

ICON plc is one of the world's largest full-service CROs — strong across Phase I–IV, all therapeutic areas, and 50+ countries. It's a strong choice for mid-to-large sponsors running pivotal and post-market programs at scale. bioaccess® is the FIH-only CRO built for the U.S. and Latin America and only runs first-in-human trials for startups. If your next milestone is a clean, FDA-bridgeable first-in-human dataset on a startup budget and timeline, bioaccess® is purpose-built for it.

Built for

Not the right fit if

Head-to-head: bioaccess® vs ICON plc

Metricbioaccess®ICON plc
FocusFIH-only for MedTech, Biopharma & Radiopharma startupsFull-service global CRO — all phases (I–IV), all therapeutic areas, all sizes; FIH is a small slice of the portfolio
FootprintU.S. + 10 Latin American countries, 50+ pre-qualified sitesGlobal (50+ countries) — strong in U.S., EU, and APAC
Typical ethics / IRB timeline4–8 weeks (Latin American ethics committees)6–12 months typical in US/EU jurisdictions
Typical per-patient cost$15K–$35K$40K–$75K in US/EU benchmark ranges
FIH start (protocol → first patient)6–8 weeks via FIH FastTrackCategory benchmark: 6–12 months for large global CROs running FIH inside US/EU networks
Pricing modelFixed-price with 12-month risk-sharing guarantee — we work at our cost if we miss agreed milestonesTypically time-and-materials or milestone-based; category norm includes change orders
Regulatory standard for devicesISO 14155 + Declaration of Helsinki; data eligible for FDA submission/review under 21 CFR 812.28ISO 14155 and ICH E6 GCP; broad regulatory coverage worldwide
Best-fit sponsor profileSeed-to-Series-B MedTech, Biopharma & Radiopharma startups running their first FIH studyMid-to-large pharma/medtech running pivotal, registration, or post-market programs across regions
Post-trial supportLatin American market access, device registration in 10 countries, HTA & payer engagementExtensive commercialization, real-world evidence and pharmacovigilance services worldwide

Comparison uses widely-known category facts about ICON plc and published US/EU benchmark ranges — not ICON plc-specific figures. bioaccess® figures reflect our FIH FastTrack operating model.

Why bioaccess® for first-in-human

ICON's scale is its advantage — a global operating footprint, deep therapeutic-area coverage, and industrial-strength systems for pivotal and post-market programs. For an early-stage startup running its first FIH study, that scale is often overkill: the $350K study lives inside a $500M portfolio and rarely gets the operational attention it needs on a founder-critical timeline.

bioaccess® is structurally the opposite: FIH-only, startup-only, focused on U.S. regulatory anchoring plus Latin American execution. That focus is what lets us hold a 12-month protocol-to-LPLV written guarantee and hand back working capital instead of change orders when milestones slip.

Data is generated under ISO 14155 and the Declaration of Helsinki and is eligible for FDA submission and review under 21 CFR 812.28 (for devices) or ICH E6 for drugs and biologics. Not a guarantee of clearance or approval — a case-by-case regulatory determination — but designed from day one to be portable to whichever CRO runs your downstream pivotal.

Frequently asked questions

Is bioaccess® a direct competitor to ICON plc?

Only in a narrow slice. ICON plc is a large, reputable organization serving a broad customer base across many programs. bioaccess® is purpose-built for a single job: first-in-human clinical trials for MedTech, Biopharma and Radiopharma startups, executed across the U.S. and Latin America. If your program is a global pivotal or a post-market study, ICON plc is often a better fit. If your program is your first-in-human trial and you need clean, FDA-bridgeable data on a startup budget and timeline, bioaccess® is purpose-built for it.

Will data from a bioaccess® Latin American trial be accepted by the FDA?

Clinical data from studies conducted outside the U.S. under ISO 14155 and the Declaration of Helsinki is eligible for FDA submission and review under 21 CFR 812.28 (for devices) and comparable ICH E6 pathways for drugs and biologics. Acceptance is a case-by-case regulatory determination, not a guarantee of clearance or approval — our regulatory team designs the study with the target FDA submission (IDE, 510(k), De Novo, PMA, HDE, IND) as the anchor.

What does a typical bioaccess® FIH study cost and how long does it take?

A standard 10-patient, single-site FIH study through FIH FastTrack runs roughly $350K all-in, with a 12-month protocol-to-LPLV written guarantee and a 6–8 week study start. Per-patient cost is $15K–$35K vs. $40K–$75K in US/EU benchmark ranges. Ethics approval is 4–8 weeks in Latin American jurisdictions vs. 6–12 months in the US/EU.

Can I use both bioaccess® and ICON plc on the same program?

Yes — sponsors regularly do. A common pattern is to run FIH with bioaccess® in Latin America to generate clean, regulator-ready data fast, then hand off to ICON plc (or a similar global CRO) for a multi-region pivotal, registration, or post-market program. Our regulatory strategy is designed to be portable so that data and documentation transfer cleanly to any downstream CRO.

Is bioaccess® cheaper than ICON for a first-in-human trial?

Per-patient cost with bioaccess® is $15K–$35K vs. $40K–$75K in US/EU benchmark ranges for a large global CRO running FIH inside its US/EU networks. A typical 10-patient FIH study through FIH FastTrack is around $350K all-in. We publish these numbers because they are the outcome of a single-focus operating model — not a discount on the same cost structure.

All CRO comparisons · First-in-Human CRO · Clinical Trials in Panama · Book a free 30-min strategy call