bioaccess® vs PPD (Thermo Fisher Scientific)

PPD, part of Thermo Fisher Scientific, is a global full-service CRO with broad therapeutic-area coverage across Phase I–IV programs. It's a strong choice for mid-to-large sponsors that need scale and integrated lab, bioanalytical, and late-phase services. bioaccess® is the First-in-Human CRO — built for the U.S. and Latin America — and only runs FIH studies for startups. If the next milestone is a clean, FDA-bridgeable first-in-human dataset on a startup timeline and budget, bioaccess® is purpose-built for it.

Built for

Not the right fit if

Head-to-head: bioaccess® vs PPD (Thermo Fisher Scientific)

Metricbioaccess®PPD (Thermo Fisher Scientific)
FocusFIH-only for MedTech, Biopharma & Radiopharma startupsFull-service global CRO — all phases (I–IV), all therapeutic areas, all sizes; FIH is a small slice of the portfolio
FootprintU.S. + 10 Latin American countries, 50+ pre-qualified sitesGlobal (50+ countries) — strong in U.S., EU, and APAC
Typical ethics / IRB timeline4–8 weeks (Latin American ethics committees)6–12 months typical in US/EU jurisdictions
Typical per-patient cost$15K–$35K$40K–$75K in US/EU benchmark ranges
FIH start (protocol → first patient)6–8 weeks via FIH FastTrackCategory benchmark: 6–12 months for large global CROs running FIH inside US/EU networks
Pricing modelFixed-price with 12-month risk-sharing guarantee — we work at our cost if we miss agreed milestonesTypically time-and-materials or milestone-based; category norm includes change orders
Regulatory standard for devicesISO 14155 + Declaration of Helsinki; data eligible for FDA submission/review under 21 CFR 812.28ISO 14155 and ICH E6 GCP; broad regulatory coverage worldwide
Best-fit sponsor profileSeed-to-Series-B MedTech, Biopharma & Radiopharma startups running their first FIH studyMid-to-large pharma/medtech running pivotal, registration, or post-market programs across regions
Post-trial supportLatin American market access, device registration in 10 countries, HTA & payer engagementExtensive commercialization, real-world evidence and pharmacovigilance services worldwide

Comparison uses widely-known category facts about PPD (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and published US/EU benchmark ranges — not PPD (Thermo Fisher Scientific)-specific figures. bioaccess® figures reflect our FIH FastTrack operating model.

Why bioaccess® for first-in-human

PPD, backed by Thermo Fisher Scientific, is exactly what mid-to-large sponsors need for large, multi-region, multi-service programs: bioanalytical labs, central labs, biostatistics, real-world evidence, pharmacovigilance and commercialization at scale. That scope is broader than a startup running its first-in-human study typically needs — and cost structures reflect it.

bioaccess® is the opposite trade-off: FIH-only, startup-only, focused on U.S. regulatory anchoring plus Latin American execution. That single-focus operating model is what makes a 6–8 week study start, 4–8 week ethics approval, $15K–$35K per patient, and a 12-month protocol-to-LPLV written guarantee possible.

Data is generated under ISO 14155 and the Declaration of Helsinki and is eligible for FDA submission and review under 21 CFR 812.28 (for devices) or ICH E6 for drugs and biologics — a case-by-case regulatory determination, not a guarantee of clearance or approval. The two models often work in sequence: run FIH with bioaccess®, then transfer to a PPD-class CRO for the pivotal.

Frequently asked questions

Is bioaccess® a direct competitor to PPD?

Only in a narrow slice. PPD is a large, reputable organization serving a broad customer base across many programs. bioaccess® is purpose-built for a single job: first-in-human clinical trials for MedTech, Biopharma and Radiopharma startups, executed across the U.S. and Latin America. If your program is a global pivotal or a post-market study, PPD is often a better fit. If your program is your first-in-human trial and you need clean, FDA-bridgeable data on a startup budget and timeline, bioaccess® is purpose-built for it.

Will data from a bioaccess® Latin American trial be accepted by the FDA?

Clinical data from studies conducted outside the U.S. under ISO 14155 and the Declaration of Helsinki is eligible for FDA submission and review under 21 CFR 812.28 (for devices) and comparable ICH E6 pathways for drugs and biologics. Acceptance is a case-by-case regulatory determination, not a guarantee of clearance or approval — our regulatory team designs the study with the target FDA submission (IDE, 510(k), De Novo, PMA, HDE, IND) as the anchor.

What does a typical bioaccess® FIH study cost and how long does it take?

A standard 10-patient, single-site FIH study through FIH FastTrack runs roughly $350K all-in, with a 12-month protocol-to-LPLV written guarantee and a 6–8 week study start. Per-patient cost is $15K–$35K vs. $40K–$75K in US/EU benchmark ranges. Ethics approval is 4–8 weeks in Latin American jurisdictions vs. 6–12 months in the US/EU.

Can I use both bioaccess® and PPD on the same program?

Yes — sponsors regularly do. A common pattern is to run FIH with bioaccess® in Latin America to generate clean, regulator-ready data fast, then hand off to PPD (or a similar global CRO) for a multi-region pivotal, registration, or post-market program. Our regulatory strategy is designed to be portable so that data and documentation transfer cleanly to any downstream CRO.

Does bioaccess® offer the bioanalytical and central-lab services PPD is known for?

No — that's outside our scope. bioaccess® is focused on first-in-human clinical execution across the U.S. and Latin America, plus Latin American market access and device registration. For integrated bioanalytical, central lab, and large-scale late-phase services, a Thermo Fisher/PPD-class partner is a better fit. The two are frequently combined: FIH with bioaccess® to generate clean, regulator-ready data fast, then PPD for downstream services at scale.

All CRO comparisons · First-in-Human CRO · Clinical Trials in Panama · Book a free 30-min strategy call